Showing posts with label Watchmen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Watchmen. Show all posts

Monday, August 8, 2016

Weekly Update #242! Tales From Alternate Earths is Available for Preorder

Editor's Note

In case you guys haven't read it already, go check out Dale Cozort's "World War II Was a Team Effort, Deal With It". This was perhaps one of the most popular posts we've on The Update in months. Dale is already working on Part 2, so stay tuned for more WWII discussion that is sure to excite all of you alternate historians out there.

And now the news...

Coming Soon: Tales From Alternate Earths

I just realized I know a lot of people involved in this anthology, but lets start from the beginning. In case you don't know what Tales From Alternate Earths is, here is the description from Amazon:

Our world could have been so very different... 

Eight stories take us on a journey into how our world could have been. What if the nukes had flown that day over Cuba? What if Caesar had survived? Imagine the Tunguska meteor with a different outcome. What if there was a true story behind HG Wells' most famous tale? See the world as it might have been if China discovered the New World first. And what if all of this was never meant to be and dinosaurs ruled the Earth? 

Authors Jessica Holmes, Daniel M. Bensen, Terri Pray, Rob Edwards, Maria Haskins, Cathbad Maponus, Leo McBride, and collaborators Brent A. Harris and Ricardo Victoria show us the world that might have been - if the butterfly's wings had fluttered a different way, if the world changed between heartbeats, if a moment of decision saw another choice. 

This is the fourth anthology from Inklings Press, aiming to provide a platform for new and upcoming authors and to open the door onto different worlds.

Besides my Facebook fried Brent Harris, long time readers of The Update may recognize the name Daniel M. Bensen, who has contributed a lot of articles to the blog. So congrats to him and everyone else who got a story accepted in this anthology. Tales from Alternate Earths is current available for pre-order in case you want to reserve your copy today.

Video of the Week

If you were one of the only people on the Internet not to watch it, here is the honest trailer for Zack Snyder's Watchmen:
I'm also not going to lie...I liked this movie. I know its sort of controversial in comic circles, but its dumb fun and it has a great soundtrack. In other news, don't forget to check out my new video on why Hollywood loves to destroy California:
Still waiting on title card from Marc. Will keep you posted.

You Should Also Check Out...
* * *

Matt Mitrovich is the founder and editor of Alternate History Weekly Update, a blogger for Amazing Stories, a volunteer interviewer for SFFWorld and a Sidewise Awards for Alternate History judge. When not exploring alternate timelines he enjoys life with his beautiful wife Alana and prepares for the day when travel between parallel universes becomes a reality. You can follow him on Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr and YouTube. Learn how you can support his alternate history projects on Patreon.

Friday, May 15, 2015

Videos for Alternate Historians #14

I didn't want to end the week without posting about something related to alternate history, so lets watch some videos. First up, here are five facts on the steampunk game, The Order: 1886:
Next up, it may not be alternate history, but Game of Thrones (and the books they are based on, A Song of Ice and Fire) sure are inspired a lot from real history. Lets take a look at the wars that inspired them:
And finally, Thug Notes reviews Alan Moore's Watchmen:
Got any videos or YouTube channels that you want to recommend? Let us know in the comments or at ahwupdate at gmail dot com.

* * *

Matt Mitrovich is the founder and editor of Alternate History Weekly Update and a blogger on Amazing Stories. Check out his short fiction. When not writing he works as an attorney, enjoys life with his beautiful wife Alana and prepares for the inevitable zombie apocalypse. You can follow him on Facebook or Twitter.

Monday, January 19, 2015

Weekly Update #176

Editor's Note

Happy Martin Luther King Jr. Day everybody!

So I am sure you guys are all waiting to hear my opinion on Amazon's The Man in the High Castle. I do have a review coming out on Amazing Stories and, spoiler alert, I liked it. In fact from all the reviews and commentary I have seen on the pilot, I am not alone in  my opinion. There was just so many reviews and commentaries that I put off writing a summary and instead added a section on the show in the Links to the Multiverse below, so you can check that out if you want more details. It certainly seems like it is the hit of the Amazon pilot season, which is good news for alternate historians, but more on that later.

No Map Monday this week. I really didn't see a map I thought was good enough to feature and instead of blogging about a mediocre map just for the sake of content, I decided to skip this week and just take the hit in page views by not posting the next installment in my most popular series. I am sure that won't have any negative side effects.

I know I promised last week two important announcements, but I am still working out the kinks. Hopefully I can make at least one of them this week.

And now the news...

New Releases: The Last American Vampire by Seth Grahame-Smith


Out now is the sequel to Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter, Steh Grahame-Smith's The Last American Vampire. Here is the description from Amazon:

Vampire Henry Sturges returns in the highly anticipated sequel to Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter-a sweeping, alternate history of twentieth-century America by New York Times bestselling author Seth Grahame-Smith.

THE LAST AMERICAN VAMPIRE

In Reconstruction-era America, vampire Henry Sturges is searching for renewed purpose in the wake of his friend Abraham Lincoln's shocking death. Henry's will be an expansive journey that first sends him to England for an unexpected encounter with Jack the Ripper, then to New York City for the birth of a new American century, the dawn of the electric era of Tesla and Edison, and the blazing disaster of the 1937 Hindenburg crash. 

Along the way, Henry goes on the road in a Kerouac-influenced trip as Seth Grahame-Smith ingeniously weaves vampire history through Russia's October Revolution, the First and Second World Wars, and the JFK assassination.

Expansive in scope and serious in execution, THE LAST AMERICAN VAMPIRE is sure to appeal to the passionate readers who made Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter a runaway success.

If you want to learn more about the author you can see his interviews on Red Eye, Reddit and B&N.

Author Updates: Jo Walton and Greg van Eekhout

Last week I talked about Jo Walton's The Just City and Greg van Eekhout's Pacific Fire. If you want to learn more about those books I highly recommend you check out the last Weekly Update. Nevertheless I would be remiss if I did not cover what people are still saying about both authors' works.

Joel Cunningham of the B&N Sci-Fi & Fantasy Blog called The Just City a "richly written, deeply imaginative story" and also praised the author for her ability to write "amazing" books for almost every genre. One of those books was My Real Children, which was recently discussed on The Sometime Seminar podcast.

And lets not forget about Greg. Paul Di Filippo, writing a review for Locus, praised the language of Pacific Fire and called the conclusion "highly satisfactory and resonant". If you want to learn more about the California Bones universe, check out this article these pictures and descriptions of the characters at Tor.

Videos for Alternate Historians

This week in videos we learn what Patton Oswalt thought about Snyder's Watchmen:
Next we see at incredibly creepy animated trailer for the upcoming The Order: 1886 PlayStation game:
And finally here as game engine trailer for Total War: Attila:

Links to the Multiverse

Amazon TV's The Man in the High Castle

Amazon Comes Out Swinging at The New York Times.
Amazon’s ‘Man in the High Castle’ off to a fantastic start at The Seattle Times.
Amazon pilot reviews: 'The Man in the High Castle' is king at Entertainment Weekly.
Competition for Netflix May Be Found in Amazon's 'The Man in the High Castle' at Latin Post.
Finally! The Man in the High Castle is Streaming on Amazon at The Counterfactual History Review.
First Footage From Philip K Dick's Man In The High Castle Looks Good at io9.
Get Your Streaming On With Amazon’s Pilot Of The Man In The High Castle at ScienceFiction.com
I would willingly watch another one, which is more than I can say about...these other series at Slate.
The Man in the High Castle, Amazon pilot, review: 'stylised and stylish' at The Telegraph.
Man In The High Castle Is Wildly Different From The Book But Still Great at io9.
Man in the High Castle Pilot: Philip K. Dick and Bald Hitler Build a Nazi America at iDigitalTimes.
New Amazon pilots include a promising Philip K. Dick adaptation at AV Club.
You Can Probably Skip Amazon’s New TV Pilots—Except for One at Wired.

Books and Short Fiction

Adam Christopher announced he’ll be writing Elementary tie-in novels for Titan Books.
The Eterna Files (Excerpt) by Leanna Renee Hieber at Tor.
The Exploding Spaceship Reviews Our Favorite Anthologies of 2014 at Bull Spec.
MIND MELD: SF Stories That Predicted the Future — Or Didn’t at SF Signal.
New WOLFHOUND CENTURY Covers… at Civilian Reader.
Review: Hive Monkey by Gareth L Powell at SFFWorld.
Review: Jani and the Greater Game by Eric Brown at Telegraph & Argus.
Review: The Ripper Affair by Lilith Saintcrow at SF Signal.

Counterfactuals, History and News

Alternate history: Passing off fiction as fact by Sitharam Yechury at Hindustan Times.
Even Robert E. Lee Wanted the Confederate Flag Gone at The Daily Beast.
Hacked news companies tweet Chinese fired on U.S. warship at CNN.
The Jesus Sutras: Some Thoughts on What Might Have Been by James Ford at Patheos.
John Kerry’s Nose and the Transcript That Changed History at The Counterfactual History Review.
This Legal "No Man's Land" Hosted Outlaws For Forty-Five Years at io9.
Native Hawaiians debate best path to sovereignty at Yahoo!
Science friction by Samit Basu at The Times of India.
A tour through New Zealand's amazing steampunk town by Tom Fassbender at Boing Boing.
Understanding World War II-Japan & Synthetic Rubber by Dale Cozort.
What 5 Dead Celebrities Would Be Up to Today at Cracked.
Year's Surprise Bestseller Turns the Holocaust into a Sentimental Mess at New Republic.

Film and Television

9 Baffling First Drafts of Classic Movie Posters at Cracked.
Brand New Concept Art of Back to the Future Part II's 2015 Technology at io9.
Idris Elba Will Bring Demon-Fighting Edgar Allan Poe to the Big Screen at Tor.
Review: 12 Monkeys at Paul Levinson's Infinite Regress.
Review: Agent Carter at Amazing Stories.
Syfy to Launch Futuristic Prison Drama 51st State at Geek Syndicate.
Whatever Will Be Will Be: Predestination and The Time Travel Movie at Tor.
Wolf at the door by Emily Hourican at Independent.ie.

Games

Review: Wolfenstein: The New Order at The Hypno Realm.
This War of Mine: Don't miss this Mac game! at iMore.

Interviews

Guy Adams at SF Signal.
Gillian Polack at SF Signal.

Podcasts

Announcing Dissecting Worlds Live! at Geek Syndicate.

* * *

Matt Mitrovich is the founder and editor of Alternate History Weekly Update and a blogger on Amazing Stories. Check out his short fiction. When not writing he works as an attorney, enjoys life with his beautiful wife Alana and prepares for the inevitable zombie apocalypse. You can follow him on Facebook or Twitter.

Thursday, October 24, 2013

Alternate Nixons Part 1

Guest post by Andrew Schneider.

With the fiftieth anniversary of John F. Kennedy’s assassination rapidly approaching, there have been quite a few new JFK histories floating around.  Thurston Clarke’s JFK’s Last Hundred Days provides some useful insights into how President Kennedy’s policy ideas were evolving in the last few months of his life, shaped in part by the traumatic loss of his baby son Patrick.  Jeff Greenfield’s If Kennedy Lived takes several of Clarke’s themes a step further – considering how Kennedy would have handled U.S. involvement in Vietnam and the civil rights struggle at home had he been reelected in 1964.

But there was another anniversary earlier this year that has been largely overlooked.  January 9 marked the centennial of the birth of Richard Nixon. Rarely have two opposing candidates for the presidency been so shaped and defined by their rivalry as were Kennedy and Nixon.

In 1960, Kennedy was the junior senator from Massachusetts.  He had wealth, charisma, and an inspiring war record, but a very thin record of legislative achievement. He was a Roman Catholic in a country where anti-Catholic sentiment was still common, particularly in the traditional Democratic strongholds of the South. He had name recognition, true, but that came from being the son of Joseph Kennedy, Sr. -- a man cast into the political wilderness for his disastrous turn as ambassador to Britain when that country was fighting for its life during World War II. Harry Truman – in 1960 the only living Democrat to have occupied the White House – was one of many concerned that Ambassador Kennedy would have an outsized influence if his son achieved the prize that had eluded him. “It’s not the Pope I’m afraid of,” Truman said. “It’s the Pop.”

Nevertheless, Kennedy broke out of a heavily contested field in 1960 to claim the Democratic nomination.
As the incumbent vice president, Nixon had superior name recognition. He was a native Californian, who could count on what was then the second-largest state bloc of electoral votes. He lacked any serious opponent for the Republican nomination, enabling him to save his resources for the general election. He was just a few years older than Kennedy and, as has been since been revealed, in considerably better health (Kennedy having suffered for years from Addison’s disease and near crippling back ailments).

Nixon certainly lacked Kennedy’s charisma. But he had something that was arguably a more valuable asset at the height of the Cold War. He had eight years of experience in the fields of foreign policy and national security. And he’d learned at the right hand of President Dwight D. Eisenhower, one of the greatest military leaders the country had ever produced.  The race was his to lose. But lose he did. The great irony was that, in large part, Kennedy won by calling into question the record of Eisenhower and Nixon on national security, stressing a missile gap with the Soviet Union that turned out to be non-existent.  On this basis, he convinced a reed-slender majority of voters that he would do a better job of keeping the country safe. In essence, he out-Nixoned Nixon.

Kennedy spent much of his term defined by the Cold Warrior mold he’d cast for himself. The late David Halberstam was one of the first to make this case in The Best and the Brightest, arguing that the McCarthy era still very much defined the acceptable bounds of foreign policy in the early 1960s. Any sign of weakness in confronting Communism anywhere in the world could lead to a sharp domestic backlash. “Who lost China?” may have lost its potency as a rallying cry in American politics by this point, but would Kennedy really want to chance having it come back as “Who lost Indochina?” Kennedy knew how this worked better than anyone, having cut his senatorial teeth on McCarthy’s Investigations Subcommittee. While McCarthy was dead, the veteran Red hunter Nixon was still very much alive.

Nixon remained a credible threat to Kennedy’s reelection until late 1962. Kennedy’s handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis and Nixon’s withdrawal from politics after losing the California governor’s race upended the table. It gave Kennedy the room to pursue one of his most significant foreign policy achievements, the Limited Nuclear Test Ban Treaty with the U.S.S.R. Even getting this through the Senate required some quiet support from former President Eisenhower. But Kennedy was still concerned enough about his right flank that he was reluctant to do anything as dramatic as pulling U.S. military advisors out of Vietnam until after he was safely reelected.

The degree to which Kennedy shaped Nixon’s career, as opposed to the other way around, is the stuff of legends. Kennedy and Nixon had both been elected to Congress in 1946. This was an era when it was possible for American politicians of different parties to be friends. And for the better part of fourteen years, the two men were friends. The 1960 campaign ended that and left Nixon with a deep sense of betrayal. The narrow margin of Kennedy’s victory, dependent as it was on the votes of Lyndon Johnson’s Texas and an Illinois dominated by Richard J. Daley’s Chicago, convinced Nixon that Kennedy had stolen the election from him. His failed comeback bid in 1962, with Kennedy campaigning against Nixon on behalf of California Governor Pat Brown, only deepened his sense of resentment.

There was always a streak of suspiciousness in Nixon. During his own presidency, this metamorphosed into what has often been described as paranoia. As Henry Kissinger himself observed, though, “Even paranoids have enemies.” Few people had done more to earn Nixon’s enmity than the Kennedys. From the day he took office in 1969 until well into 1972, Nixon was convinced that JFK’s sole surviving brother, Ted Kennedy, was the biggest threat to his political survival. The Chappaquiddick Incident, and the younger Kennedy’s involvement in the death of Mary Jo Kopechne, made this highly unlikely. But by this point, Nixon was taking no chances.

Ultimately, it was Nixon’s determination to break his enemies, real and imagined, before they could break him that led to Watergate and forced his resignation in disgrace.

Kennedy’s assassination has been described, both at the time and in the half century since, as a tragedy.  The violent murder of a relatively young and apparently vigorous leader was certainly a national trauma.  There is ample evidence that Kennedy would have sought to wind down America’s commitment in Vietnam starting in 1965, had he lived and won reelection. By that measure, the bullets fired at Dealey Plaza may have been a contributing factor to the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans, not to mention well over a million Vietnamese. But a tragedy, at least in the classical sense of the term, is something that is at least partially self-inflicted. And by this measure, the term tragedy more accurately describes Nixon’s fate.

Nixon was a man driven to achieve great things by monumental ambition, and who ultimately succeeded. But the cost was immense. What he went through in order to achieve his goals magnified his character flaws –distrust, jealousy, self-doubt, bitterness, to name just a few – until they overwhelmed not only his talents but his reason. There are few clearer statements of tragedy in American political rhetoric than the most memorable line in Nixon’s farewell address: “Always remember, others may hate you. But those who hate you don’t win unless you hate them. And then you destroy yourself.” In the process, he nearly tore the country apart.

A tragedy, any kind of tragedy, is one that naturally invokes the question, “What if?” “What if Kennedy had lived?” is one that people have been asking ever since November 22, 1963, and it is by far the most popular starting point for any alternate history focused on JFK.  Nixon, by comparison, is a far less popular figure either for AH fiction or counterfactual analysis.

Because Nixon did ultimately win the presidency, such speculation tends to focus on what happened during his time in office, particularly the Watergate scandal. Alan Moore’s Watchmen is set in a world where Washington Post reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein were murdered, the 22nd Amendment was repealed, and Richard Nixon is serving his fifth term as president. This required not only altering history but bending the laws of physics. Watchmen, after all, is set in a world where superheroes exist and where the U.S. won an outright victory in the Vietnam War, thanks to the nuclear-powered Dr. Manhattan.

Less frequently explored is the question of how Nixon would have behaved as president had he won the 1960 election.  Harvey Simon explored this last year in The Madman Theory: An Alternate History of the Cuban Missile Crisis.  There are at least two major problems with this book.  One is that, as the title indicates, it presumes a President Nixon in 1962 would have acted with the same degree of irrationality as the real Richard Nixon did in the later years of his presidency.  Even if one argues that the earlier Nixon had the same psychology of the later one, this ignores Nixon’s behavior during the Yom Kippur War of 1973, which itself could easily have turned into a nuclear confrontation with the Soviets.

My bigger problem with the book is that it jumps straight from Nixon’s election to the Cuban Missile Crisis. The crisis, though, was in no small part the result of Kennedy’s decision first to go ahead with the Bay of Pigs invasion, then to deny the Cuban exile forces any direct American military support, and finally to abandon them. The debacle convinced Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev that Kennedy, despite his anti-Communist rhetoric and policies, was a weak leader who would fold rather than risk a confrontation.
It’s unlikely a President Nixon would have conducted the Bay of Pigs the same way. Indeed, his own advice to Kennedy in the wake of the debacle -- “It is essential that you act as big as you talk” -- reflects this. Nor is it likely that Khrushchev, who had met Nixon and undoubtedly knew far more about him than he did about Kennedy in 1961, would have viewed Nixon as someone he could bluff or bully.

Had Nixon gone full bore into Cuba, with air support and naval support for the Bay of Pigs invasion, Khrushchev would have trumpeted it as another example of American imperialism. For this, he would have gotten a positive hearing from at least some Latin American nations, as well as any number of nations around the world that had just emerged from colonialism. Would Khrushchev have escalated the crisis into a superpower confrontation?  I doubt it.  Nixon was a close observer of the Hungarian Revolution of 1956. He would have been the first to remind Khrushchev that the U.S. had stayed its hand when the Soviets used force against a country they considered part of their sphere of influence.

The result might have been a quick victory for the American/anti-Castro Cuban forces, or it might have turned into a guerrilla war that would have ground on for years. Either way, it would have meant no Cuban Missile Crisis. It also may have headed off deeper American involvement in Vietnam.

One of the reasons Kennedy felt obliged to shore up the Saigon government was to draw a line in the sand against the further spread of Communism after having failed to do so in Cuba.  Nixon had been all for U.S. military intervention in Vietnam in 1954, in order to shore up the French at Dien Bien Phu. Eisenhower had scotched the idea.  By 1960, the U.S. was providing military advisors to support the government of President Diem, but little more. Nixon would have been under far less pressure to step up that aid, much less to send combat troops.

Learn more about the alternate history of this controversial president in Alternate Nixons Part 2, coming out tomorrow.

* * *

Andrew Schneider is the business news reporter for KUHF Houston Public Radio. His work has appeared in print in The Kiplinger Letter and The Writer, as well as online at KUHF.org. He is currently writing a memoir of his time in Afghanistan as a war correspondent. You can follow him on Facebook or on Twitter.

Friday, August 9, 2013

Before Watchmen Finale: Conclusion

Guest post by Sean Korsgaard.
With the Before Watchmen series concluded, and the previously announced epilogue cancelled, now comes the time we ask ourselves the ever important question: how does Before Watchmen measure up, to both its rightly revered predecessor, and on its own?

A number of the series actually hold up pretty well regarding both questions – the four I’d single out as the successful titles would be Ozymandias, Minutemen, Silk Spectre and Dollar Bill. All shed light on corners of the Watchmen universe we’d barely seen details of before, and did so with compelling stories that, given time, can and should be considered a part of the greater Watchmen universe, creating a greater application for both themselves and Watchmen.

Conversely, most of the other titles were midrange at best, or in the case of Comedian or Nite Owl, completely terrible, and somewhat justified the fears that the Before Watchmen lines would be rushed cash-ins. I doubt even the worst of their number (Nite Owl, in case you were wondering) will besmirch the Watchmen name, as I don’t expect them to stick around in the popular consciousness long enough for them to have an effect on it. Which, given some of the titles, may be for the best.

So needless to say, the results have proven something of a mixed bag, and especially after all the behind the scenes drama, compared to the highly promoted beginnings, Before Watchmen ended on a real whimper. Sales were midrange, reviews have been all over the place, and a lot of comic fans don’t know what to think. So when considering the possible impact and legacy of Before Watchmen, there are two questions one needs to consider – does it measure up to Watchmen, and does it stand up on its own.

Does it measure up to Watchmen? Of course not, and there was very little chance of that happening, which is part of the reason there hasn't been any follow-up with Watchmen until now. Ignoring it’s critical laurels and sales numbers, Watchmen is so beloved in part at least because at the time, it was unlike anything else people had ever seen from a comic book – it was dark, thoughtful, contemplative, and deconstructed many of the familiar comic book tropes and went against what many people expected a comic book should be. It changed the way people looked at, read, and made comic books, even close to three decades after Watchmen’s original publication.

That last bit may be the most important to consider with the Before Watchmen titles – in the decades since Watchmen was published, comics with themes or pathos, or considered dark and mature, or that play against type have become the norm – there is a reason why the post-Watchmen age of comic books is known as the Dark Age of Comics after all. When Watchmen came out, there was nothing else like it on the market – since then, we've seen Batman get his spine shattered, Superman die and return to life, Spiderman sell his soul to the devil, the Marvel universe fight a Civil War, and the DC Universe reboot itself entirely with the New 52. We've also seen the comic book industry experience all-time low sales, all while their contents flood the cinemas. Watchmen has the impact it did because it was so different and as such, changed comics forever. Any follow-up could not do the same because comics like Watchmen are now no longer the exception, they’re the gold standard.

Which brings us to the next question – how do the Before Watchmen titles stand on their own? Mixed results aside, at least the four I mentioned before are great, and I’d wager they’ll be looked back on as classics in their own right in the future, albeit classics not as great as Watchmen. Even the other lines, though disappointing or lackluster, are arguably among the better titles on the comic racks currently, with few exceptions.

One only wonders if DC Comics had taken more time to plan these titles, and avoided the behind the scenes drama, how the entire line may have come out. Alas, now we’re dealing with alternate history.

Overall, even given the poor entries, I’d say Before Watchmen can claim some successes to be proud of, and has a few titles that are well worth your time and attention. Give them a chance and a glance, and maybe a few will surprise you.

* * *

Soldier, scholar, writer and web-voyeur, Sean CW Korsgaard has been active in the alternate history community since 2006, and was recently elected to succeed Mitro as President of the Alternate History Online Facebook group. In addition to his contributions at the Alternate History Weekly Update, he writes for several websites, including his own, which can be found here.

Friday, February 15, 2013

Alternate History and Superheroes

Guest post by Ben Ronning.

Superheroes and alternate history are two subgenres of science fiction that have always appeared to compliment one another but very few writers ever dared to combine and exploit to its fullest. One reason for this is continuity, the holy grail of all comic book geeks. Ever since the debut of Superman in 1938 and the Fantastic Four in 1961, the Big Two of the comic book industry more or less rely on a floating timeline that prevents their characters from aging (though continuity is far murkier for DC after two major reboots and countless smaller retcons.) Superman could be BFFs with Joseph Kennedy in 1963 then be shaking hands with Ronald Reagan twenty years later without aging a single day. Another reason is because both companies, especially Marvel, pride themselves on verisimilitude by making their universe superficially similar to ours so neither company has fully addressed the social and geopolitical implications of the effective demigods in their midst until recent years with Marvel’s Civil War and DC’s 52.

However, one can consider Marvel’s What If? titles and DC’s Elseworlds line alternate history to some extent. These titles largely centered on the individual histories of their characters like “What if Spider-Man Joined the Fantastic Four?” or “What if Sgt. Nick Fury Fought World War II in Space?” rather than historical events from our world. Some scenarios such as “What if Captain America Were Revived Today?” from What If? (vol. 1) #44 possesses some trappings of alternate history. For example, Namor the Sub-Mariner took a different route when the Avengers pursued him in Avengers (vol. 1)  #4 so he never discovered the group of Inuit who worshiped a frozen Steve Rogers and thus never hurled Captain America into the ocean for the Avengers to find. The Avengers eventually disbanded without Captain America, but more disturbingly, a janitor working at a government facility awakened the mentally unstable 1950s Captain America and Bucky from suspended animation and convinced them that the United States was in danger from subversive elements. As such, the impostor Captain America and Bucky became involved with a political movement that transformed the United States into a police state until a crew of American sailors found the true Cap in the Arctic.

Marvel, aside from a dalliance with a robot Stalin, waited almost twenty years to dip their toe into the alternate history ocean with Neil Gaiman’s 1602. While not technically a What If? issue, the mini-series has a point of divergence (a Captain America from a potential future goes back in time to the failed Roanoke colony and aids in their survival) that causes various Marvel characters to appear nearly four hundred years before they should have. Instead of being the director of S.H.I.E.L.D. Nick Fury is Elizabeth I’s chief intelligence officer whose apprentice is Peter Parquagh, an ersatz version of a nameless friendly neighborhood webslinger. However, one of the more intriguing elements of Marvel 1602 is Gaiman weaved themes from X-Men into late Elizabethan history, particularly James I’s persecution of the “witchbreed” or mutants and how Magneto is ostensibly a grand inquisitor for the Spanish Inquisition but hides his illicit activities behind his position.

This fascination with alternate history continued with the fourth volume of What If? in late 2005. Unlike most issues of the title, which were largely self-contained worlds, this volume of the series took place within in a single timeline where Captain America’s genesis occurs in the American Civil War as opposed to World War II and the Fantastic Four were Russian cosmonauts. Being more of an aficionado of American history, I prefer the Captain America one and appreciate how Cap because more of a physical manifestation of the American spirit during one the nation’s most troubled periods rather than symbol. Because of this Cap’s presence shortens the Civil War, prevents Abraham Lincoln’s assassination, and his origins in Native American mysticism sparked a cultural craze that prevented the Indian Wars of the 1870s. Out of the six What If? (Vol. 4) one-shots, only Captain America and Fantastic Four address the broader strokes of alternate history whereas the other four are more character-focused. Unfortunately, Marvel did not revisit this timeline as they did Marvel 1602, but they are well worth the effort of searching through the odd long box for.

Meanwhile, DC, like their marvelous competition, has only dabbled in the realm of alternate history with its Elseworlds line but there are a few notable examples such as Batman: Holy Terror written by Alan Brennert and illustrated by Norm Breyfogle. The point of divergence for this story is that Oliver Cromwell lived ten years longer and the United States became a totalitarian, theocratic state. While I have never read the issue on account that it has been out of print for over twenty years, a cursory glance of the synopsis on Wikipedia was enough to pique my interest and should do the same for other alternate history enthusiasts. DC’s Tangent imprint, introduced in 1997, operates under a similar premise where there are not only vastly different versions of Superman, the Flash, the Atom, and even obscure characters like the Sea Devils but the presence of superpowered beings radically altered history from what we know. The central premise behind the imprint is that an alternate version of the Atom intervened in the Cuban Missile Crisis, which resulted in the destruction of Florida and Cuba. As such, Atlanta became an underwater city populated by merpeople, their technology advanced further than the mainstream DC Universe, and the hippie movement was in its infancy when the nineties rolled around.

Dan Jurgens, the man who killed Superman and the brain behind Tangent, justified this divergence when he told Comic Book Resources:
“While the DCU Earth is essentially the same as our own, no more advanced in terms of technology or communications despite the existence of those qualities within the super-powered community, Earth Tangent is greatly influenced by all of that. Earth Tangent's economic, geographic and political landscapes are defined by the superhero community, whereas in the DCU those aspects exist unaffected by the superhero community.”
Jurgens brings up an excellent point about a medium that birthed the trope, “Reed Richards is Useless.” Take the Flash’s rogues gallery for example, Captain Cold and his cohorts possess technology that can generate temperatures near absolute zero, alter weather patterns, and even transmute the 118 elements. Why did the scientists and business leaders not reverse engineer the technology after the Central City Police Department confiscated it? The Tangent imprint gives something of a look at such a world and is perhaps a blueprint for how ambitious writers should combine the two genres.

Some could argue that Superman: Red Son is an alternate history and I suppose it is to some extent. The premise is simple enough: baby Kal-L lands in Ukraine in 1938 instead of Kansas. However, my impression of the mini-series is that if it is alternate history, it is about squishy as bag full of marshmallows (or a Type X on Sliding Scale of Alternate History Plausibility.) Its writer, Mark Millar, makes reference to even greater civil unrest in the late 1960s under surviving JFK, a war against communists in the South Pacific in 1983, and a second American Civil War in 1986 without too much elaboration. Granted, there are constraints to the medium but it is clear that the focus is more on Superman as a seemingly benevolent leader of the Soviet Union and his rivalry with Lex Luthor than on the butterflies that a Soviet Man of Steel would create. That is not to say Red Son is not worth reading, it is more fantasy than alternate history.

Watchmen, by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons, is the mirror image of Red Son in terms of realism and setting. In fact, the world of Watchmen could be a reflection ours until 1938 where the first appearance of Superman in Action Comics #1 inspired a wave of costumed vigilantes, and again in 1959 with the creation of Dr. Manhattan. Alternate history is one portion of Watchmen’s complexity that Moore executes extremely well. Dr. Manhattan essentially gave the United States the strategic advantage in the Cold War and practically won the Vietnam War single-handedly but that also becomes a disadvantage because he is also the lone reason why the Soviet Union stays in check. Hence, Moore makes the consequences of his departure realistic as evidenced by the Soviet invasion of Pakistan and bringing Earth closer to the brink of Nuclear War. However, there are also several other economic and cultural consequences as well. The good doctor’s ability to synthesize lithium allows for the mass production of electric cars, hence reducing the United States’ dependence of foreign petroleum, and the appearance “real” superheroes essentially led to the death of the medium in the late forties so pirate comics like “The Tales of the Black Freighter.” (Though I wonder how Indian fast food became so popular with the American public instead of McDonalds.) Watchmen is practically required reading for all comic book fans, but to read it again from the prism of an alternate historian demonstrates how well the two genres blend.

One of the things I admire about alternate history is that it posed a question Marvel asked when they released a new title in February 1977, “what if?” Personally, I am not as interested in the typical “What if the Axis won World War II?” or “What if the Confederacy won the American Civil War?” as I am interested in smaller events like “What if a more moderate candidate sought the democratic nomination in 1972” or “What if Lucille Ball decided not to sell Desilu Studios to Gulf+Western?” because even the smallest pebble can create many ripples. Marvel 1602, Tangent Comics, and Watchmen demonstrate that alternate history can blend with the fantastic as peanut butter tends to do with chocolate, and they are only the tip of the glacier. In a universe populated by gods, aliens, and immortal cavemen who could alter the flow of history well before the 20th century, the myriad of scenarios to use as story fodder is practically endless. Is there a writer ambitious enough to push this hybrid genre to its creative limits?

Only time will tell.

* * *

Aspiring writer and platypus enthusiast Ben Ronning has lurked the AH.com boards since June 2006. When he is not roaming the multiverse, he can be found at his blog, Thoughts of a Platypus.

Friday, July 27, 2012

Review: Before Watchmen

Guest post by Sean Korsgaard.
The early titles of the Before Watchmen series have been coming out for almost two months now, and I’m sure I can guess the questions on everyone’s minds: is it as bad as we’d feared? Is it worth a look, or even pretty good? Do we dare hope it even measure up to Watchmen? While it may be too early to tell that last one, I do have some brief summaries of the issues and titles currently out, as well as which ones I feel are worth a look. Read on!

Minutemen #1 and #2

A Watchmen prequel following the adventures of the Minutemen has been talked about for decades, and was even briefly considered being done by Watchmen-creator Alan Moore, so it should come as little surprise that such a title focused on such has been included in the Before Watchmen series.

Following the original group of masked vigilantes that sparked the POD of the Watchmen universe, the first two issues of the title introduce us to each member and the origins of the team by means of a flashback from Hollis Mason (aka, Nite Owl I and author of Under the Hood). It fleshes out the origins and personas of each character, while also dropping hints at the fates that eventually befalls each of them. To top it all off, the title boasts very crisp artwork that immediately hearkens back to the Golden Age of comics, while with its nine panel format, follows the format that served Watchmen so well.

Two issues in, I can easily say it’s the best title in the Before Watchmen line so far, both in terms of story and art, and more than any of the others, feels like a Watchmen title. If you can only pick up one title of the set, this is the one you want to buy, and I am fairly certain that it will only continue to be more so as the rest of the Minutemen issues come out.

Silk Spectre #1 and #2

Of all the main cast of Watchmen, the Silk Spectre is the one we really know very little about, which leaves plenty of room for her Before Watchmen title to explore. At least so far, I’d say the title has done so marvelously.

The story briefly looks at Laurie Juspeczyk’s childhood, as her mother Sally Jupiter tells her some cold truths about life, before fast forwarding to her teenage years. Here her life is dominated by both her desire to be a normal teen and her mother constantly training and pushing her to follow in her footsteps. She, like so many other children of the sixties, runs off to find herself and gets caught up in a caper in San Francisco that may just prove she is her mother’s child.

The story so far is much more intimate and personal than any of the other titles, providing the basics of a coming of age story while also showing how Laurie begins to accept her succession to the Silk Spectre mantle. It helps that it the line is coupled with some truly stunning artwork, one filled with little nods to Watchmen, such as opening to Laurie dropping the snow globe after hearing her parents arguing. Though it stumbles a bit in the second issue, the first issue hit the nail on the head enough that I expect good things from future issues – I hope I’m right.

The Comedian #1

You’d never think that a character killed in the first chapter of Watchmen would leave as much of a mark as the Comedian, and yet the psychotic anti-hero casts a shadow on all the events that follow. In the process, The Comedian became one of the most legendary anti-heroes in comics, so needless to say, his Before Watchmen title has some big shoes to fill.

The story opens with a friendly game of football between President Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Ted Kennedy, and Eddie Blake, aka the Comedian, amidst flashbacks of him killing Marilyn Monroe by command of Jackie. It seems the Comedian is an old war buddy of JFK, and one of his most trusted men when it comes to dirty work. One such bit of dirty work happens to be taking down a drug ring operated by Moloch the Mystic – a bit of dirty work assigned to him the same day JFK gets shot in Dallas. Something stinks, and The Comedian is right in the thick of it.

Of all the titles in Before Watchmen so far, this is going to be the one that sparks the most debates. From the get go, there will be people who will hate it because it’s an unofficial part of Watchmen lore that the Comedian short JFK. Others will hate it because seeing the Comedian playing football with the Kennedys is a far cry from the blood-drunk rapist anti-hero Watchmen immortalized. I can see where they’re coming from… but the story is told so well that I can’t bring myself to criticize it, not yet at least. I do think the Comedian exploring the Watchmen-verse Kennedy assassination has the makings of a great story, and while I’m cautious, there is enough here that I will give it a couple more issues to see where it goes with the story.

Nite Owl #1

Of all of the original Watchmen characters, the Nite Owl serves as the most accessible character, acting as an everyman of sorts for the reader to relate to. While good from a narrative standpoint, for a prospective prequel about Nite Owl II, it poses a problem as it gives the most free reign and the most room to go off track, and as a result, we get the first title of the Before Watchmen series to go off the rails.

The story opens with a young Nite Owl-obsessed Dan Dreiberg, as he uncovers the secret identity of his predecessor Hollis Mason, then trains with him as his replacement, and then an immediate team-up with Rorschach on his first night on the job. Along the way, we see his abusive childhood and his first encounters with his Watchmen teammates, including first sparks with Silk Spectre II.

More so than any other title, Nite Owl was a major letdown. Discounting the artwork, which was great, there really is nothing special about the comic itself to tell you it is a Watchmen title aside from the characters. Of course, even if it weren’t a Before Watchmen title, it would still be below average. The back story given for Nite Owl II never really reels you in, is so generic and impersonal it could be any heroes back story, and at the same time feels very rushed. While we’re only one issue in, this is the kind of handiwork I’m sure a lot of people feared when they announced Before Watchmen. My fingers are crossed that changes with issue two, because if not, this will be the first title of the series to have failed to justify its existence.

Ozymandias #1

Smartest man in the world and the central antagonist of the original Watchmen series, the title that follows Ozymandias had perhaps the most potential as a character study, as aside from Silk Spectre II, Ozy is the character we really know the least about, in terms of both who he is and what motivates him. If Ozymandias #1 is an indication, it may very well cast some light on him while telling a great story in the process.

The opening issue opens to Adrian Veidt, aka, Ozymandias, recording his life story prior to him commencing his plan to prevent nuclear Armageddon that we saw unleashed in Watchmen. He recounts his birth and origins, his struggles with both his intellect and his identity, and how a journey through Asia in the footsteps of his namesake and idol, Alexander the Great, would change both him and his vision to change the world forever.

Thanks in part to the fantastic neo-classical art style, as well as the masterful first-person narrative style which so perfectly nails Veidt’s own voice, the entire story has an epic feel to it, and more than any other title, captures the very essence of the character the title follows. Along with Minutemen, it is the only title that truly captures the same tone and feel of Watchmen, as well as casting a light in some truly fascinating areas for us to look at. With issue one ending just as Adrian decides to become a vigilante, I can’t wait to see where the title will go next.

Curse of the Crimson Corsair – parts 1-7

As a number of you might remember, in the Watchmen universe, because costumed vigilantes are a fact of life, comic books don’t focus on superheroes, instead featuring a variety of stories about soldiers, cowboys, spacemen, and even pirates. One such pirate title, Tales of the Black Freighter, showcased as a comic within a comic in Watchmen, told a story about a man adrift and alone on the open sea, with events happening in the comic usually foreshadowing events going on in Watchmen. To pay homage to this, each of the Before Watchmen comics features two pages of another pirate story, The Curse of the Crimson Corsair.

The story focuses on young idealist sailor Gordon McClachlan, whom after witnessing a crew member keelhauled for a minor offense, and feeling his captain unjust, leads a failed mutiny, and is only saved from the noose by his ship getting sunk by a Spanish frigate. After surviving adrift for days, he is rescued by a passing ship – a ship, known as The Flying Dutchman.

While I’m not a fan of how they limited this story to two pages per issue, I have to admit, it’s good enough I look forward to the next installment as much as I do the next issue itself. The story of Gordon’s misadventures at sea is enrapturing, and the art style of the story is fantastic and fits the tone perfectly. I’ve always enjoyed comics that go beyond the superheroes that most follow, and the salty pirate tale her does quite nicely. While your mileage may vary, and some would be fast to dismiss it as filler, I think it holds its own against any of the other titles. Can’t wait to see how Master McClaclan fares aboard the Dutchman!

* * *

So how do the early titles of Before Watchmen hold up to the hype, let alone their inspiration? Pretty well actually, the stories told are enjoyable so far, the art is fantastic all around, and with the possible exception of Nite Owl, so far, Before Watchman is some of the best stuff on the comic rack. Perhaps most importantly, once again, excluding Nite Owl, all of it feels like it deserves the Watchmen pedigree, each title fits the character it focuses on perfectly, and little shoutouts to the original Watchmen abound the better titles.

Is it as good as Watchmen? I think it’s too early to tell, but it’s certainly proved it’s more than a quick cash grab, and has earned my continued attention. Does it deserve yours? So far, I’d heartily recommend Minutemen and Ozymandias, and give a cautious endorsement to both Silk Spectre and Comedian, but if any of those titles sounds like you might enjoy it, I certainly recommend you give it a chance. So far, I’d say Before Watchmen has earned that chance.

* * *

Soldier, scholar, writer and web-voyeur, Sean CW Korsgaard has been active in the alternate history community since 2006, and was recently elected to succeed Mitro as President of the Alternate History Online Facebook group. In addition to his contributions at the Alternate History Weekly Update, he writes for several websites, including his own, which can be found here.

Friday, June 15, 2012

Preview: Before Watchmen

Guest post by Sean Korsgaard.

Few names in either comic books or alternate history carry as much reverence as Watchmen. The tale of a world on the brink of nuclear Armageddon, a world where masked vigilantes have existed since the 1930s, Vietnam is a US state and President Richard Nixon was just sworn in for his fifth term has been a magnum opus of both mediums since its publication back in 1986, for the striking artwork of Dave Gibbons, the dark and compelling story by Alan Moore, and for a dozen different details and nuances which have made the series a classic. Few works of any genre or medium can claim to have had the impact or legacy of Watchmen.

So it should come as little surprise given its golden reception (and revenue) that publisher DC comics had been trying to do a prequel/sequel almost literally since the original got off the presses, with ideas ranging from Rorschach’s Journal to the Comedian’s War Diary, to one following the Minutemen, with the one thing holding up such projects being Moore and Gibbons refusal to return to Watchmen. Even that would only keep DC at bay for so long from trying to hatch a few more gold eggs, and after months of rumors and speculation, last February, DC Comics announced they were launching a number of prequel miniseries:

•Before Watchmen: Minutemen (6 issues) – Writer/Artist: Darwyn Cooke
•Before Watchmen: Silk Spectre (4 issues) – Writers: Darwyn Cooke and Amanda Conner. Artist: Amanda Conner
•Before Watchmen: Comedian (6 issues) – Writer: Brian Azzarello. Artist: J. G. Jones
•Before Watchmen: Nite Owl (4 issues) – Writer: J. Michael Straczynski. Artists: Andy and Joe Kubert
•Before Watchmen: Rorschach (4 issues) – Writer: Brian Azzarello. Artist: Lee Bermejo
•Before Watchmen: Dr. Manhattan (4 issues) – Writer: J. Michael Straczynski. Artist: Adam Hughes
•Before Watchmen: Ozymandias (6 issues) – Writer: Len Wein. Artist: Jae Lee
•Before Watchmen: Epilogue (One-Shot) - Writers: Various. Artists: Various

To say the least, the move has attracted a great deal of controversy and attention, with most people either furious that DC would have the gall to add on to what is widely hailed as the greatest comic book of all time, or cautiously optimistic at the possibility of further enhancing it. I myself am one of the latter, with DC’s New 52 having rekindled my childhood interest in comics somewhat, and for your reading pleasure, I shall be handing Weekly Update’s look at the return to one of alternate history’s most acclaimed and beloved works. I will be giving issue-by-issue reviews, looks back at the original Watchmen comics and movie, discussing the impact of the original, and of course, letting you know if Before Watchmen is worth looking into every step of the way.

Who watches the (Before) Watchmen? For now, I do, and I’ll let you know if you should too!

[Editor's Note: Sean has posted a review of the issues he has read.]

*          *          *

Soldier, scholar, writer and web-voyeur, Sean CW Korsgaard has been active in the alternate history community since 2006, and was recently elected to succeed Mitro as President of the Alternate History Online Facebook group. In addition to his contributions at the Alternate History Weekly Update, he writes for several websites, including his own, which can be found here.

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Weekly Update #40.2

Editor's Note

Sorry for the links-only post yesterday.  I had some real life issues I had to deal with so I had to set my virtual life aside for a moment.  I will try not to do it again in the future.

So we surpassed our monthly record...again!  That is the fourth time in a row and our new record is 4,725 page views in a month.  That accomplishment, however, pales in comparison to what a fan of Weekly Update, Tyler Bugg, wrote on our Facebook page:

Hey, I would like to thank you guys for posting that Candlemark and Gleam were looking for submissions for their Alternate History short story anthology: If it were not for you guys, I would not have noticed, and would not have gotten my story accepted by the editors to actually be published in it!
You are welcome Tyler, but more importantly, thank you.  Your statement represents everything I was trying to accomplish when I started this blog last year.  I wanted to keep fans of the genre better informed about the world of alternate history and you have provided evidence that I have been successful with my goal.  Good luck with C&G, and I look forward to reading your short story.

Meanwhile, we got our first readers from Guam, Honduras and Jamaica.  Welcome!

And now the news...

DC Announces Before Watchmen

This summer, DC Entertainment will publish all-new stories expanding on Alan Moore's Watchmen, the alternate history comic book that was also made into a movie. The seven inter-connected prequel mini-series, called Before Watchmen, will build on the foundation of the original story.  Writers and artists on the project include Brian Azzarello, Lee Bermejo, Amanda Conner, Darwyn Cooke, John Higgins, Adam Hughes, J.G. Jones, Andy Kubert, Joe Kubert, Jae Lee, J. Michael Straczynski and Len Wein.

Each week, a new issue will be released, and will feature a two-page back-up story called Curse of the Crimson Corsair, written by original series editor Len Wein and with art by original series colorist John Higgins. There will also be a single issue, Before Watchmen: Epilogue, featuring the work of various writers and artists, and a Crimson Corsair story by Wein and Higgins.

Will Before Watchmen live up to the hype?  Probably not.  Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons are not involved in the project and Moore is firmly against it.  More importantly, I have experienced first hand what a prequel series can do to a great story (if you do not believe me, go watch Star Wars: Episode I when it comes out in 3D).  I could go on, but Tim Callahan makes a better argument against the series then I ever could.

Will I still read it?  Probably.  Though I am going to wait for it to come out in graphic novel form.

Is J. J, Abrams Ripping Off S. M. Stirling?

NBC has picked up a new drama pilot from the Star Trek director J. J. Abrams and Warner Bros. TV. The new show is called Revolution and it will be written by Supernatural creator Eric Kripke.  The logline: “A high octane action drama from J. J. Abrams following a group of characters struggling to survive and reunite with loved ones in a world where all forms of energy have mysteriously ceased to exist.”

Huh...I could swear that I have seen this before...

Of course!  S.M. Stirling's Emberverse series, where alien space bats change the laws of physics and thus wipe out modern civilization.  So is Stirling on the phone with his lawyer?  Well according to Guadalupe Lopez-Gutierrez (Kier Salmon) on the S. M. Stirling Appreciation Society:

We are discussing this... but the concept of no more power is one used in many books, Ariel, Here be dragons, and others. It's the actual characters locations and solutions that would make a copyright violation.
So it looks like the Stirling camp is in wait and see mode. Whether Revolution even classifies as alternate history also remains to be seen, but perhaps a good post-apocalyptic series is just what network television needs.

Resources to Help You Get Published


If you already have published your own steampunk story, you might be interested in submitting your previously published work to Steampunk Revolution.  This new steampunk anthology is being edited by Ann VanderMeer for publication in Fall 2012.  Deadline for submissions is March 1.

Not a published author yet?  Well I have a few resources to share with you.  Those hoping to submit a story to Dark Moon's Zombie Jesus and Other True Stories should check out this interview, which gives a writer some idea about what the editors are looking for.  Meanwhile, those looking to improve their writing ability should check out these two writing seminars I found.  The first is called Tweaking History: Steampunk And Other Tales Of Alternate History and it is being presented by Beth Daniels.  The seminar begins Feb 13 and costs only $25 ($15 if you are a premium member of the website).  The second is called Superstars Writing Seminar which will last from April 30 to May 2.  Lecturers include Kevin J. Anderson (The Trinity Paradox, Alternitech) and Eric Flint (1632).

As always, good luck.

*   *   *

Mitro is founder, editor and contributor of Alternate History Weekly Update. When he is not busy writing about his passion for alternate history, he spends his time working as a licensed attorney in the state of Illinois and dreams of being a published author himself one day.