Showing posts with label Editorial. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Editorial. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 6, 2016

In Defense of Forums

Guest post by Alexander “SpanishSpy” Wallace.
There has been much talk of how the future of the alternate history community on the Internet is gravitating towards formats that are distinct from the traditional forum format. Facebook groups are the new format that many like to point to as the future of the community. I do believe, however, that forums provide a key asset that other such formats, such as Facebook groups or subreddits, simply do not: permanence.

Boards such as AlternateHistory.com or others such as Althistoria, Otherhistory, or Othertimelines bump their threads up to the front of each individual forum when they are commented upon; other formats have no such mechanisms. This is what allows longer works to be able to be sustained, and what allows titans of the genre and the community to thrive. Years of effort can be put into these great works; after all they gave us AlternateHistory.com’s greatest.

You just can’t do the same thing on Facebook or Reddit; threads are vapid, passing things that are quickly cast away in the course of a few days to a few hours. They lack the ability to rocket up to the front page of a forum once new activity has been logged. Reddit technically can but its algorithm makes that a truly titanic effort. Facebook isn’t much better and I am not familiar enough with Tumblr to judge.

In his previous post, "Is the Alternate History Community Over-Centralized?" this site’s esteemed owner Matt Mitrovich speculated that the new generation alternate historians will prefer social media to discussion forums. I can understand this sentiment, but I feel that the two serve different niches, and as such will allow the the propagation of different forms of interaction.

The names of the two genres reveal the distinct differentiation of function. Social media is about people and making connections over shared interests, such as alternate history in our case. Discussion forums, on the other hand, are focused around ideas, around discussion of ideas and not about people. Those involved in the discussion are of secondary importance to the actual ideas. An alternate world is nothing more than a series of ideas presented together in conversation with one another and as such forums provide a natural place for such timelines.

There is another key advantage of forums: they are centralized. The transient nature of social media is not conducive to bringing talent together in a form that can be easily appreciated. The permanence of forums and the ease of discussion as described above are what attracts the good writers who write the masterworks. With masterworks in one place, more people will come and will discuss these bundles of ideas.

Social media, on the other hand, is primary a means of association and those who join said groups are primarily looking for the communal aspect. This is not to say that there is no community on forums or discussion of ideas on social media, far from it. The way to attract people, however, is quite different. Social media emphasizes community, while forums emphasize the content generated and the ideas discussed. They are two different purposes.

Social media and forums are each tailored to their very specific role in the broader community, and each attract people looking for something different. Forums provide a permanence and a format that social media cannot match; as such, forums are going nowhere.

* * *

Alexander "SpanishSpy" Wallace is the author of several works of alternate history on alternatehistory.com and the alternate history wikia, including the 2014 Turtledove Award Winner for Best New Speculative, The Rise of the Tri-State World Order: A Timeline of Orwell's 1984, Emancipation and Exodus, and Scorpions in a Bottle, as well as other works. 

Friday, December 11, 2015

Should You Judge an Indie Book By Its Cover?

One of the recurring segments on my YouTube channel, Unboxing Alternatives, has quickly become a show where I literally judge a book by its cover before I give an actual review. Of course, many people have heard of the old saying "don't judge a book by its cover" and some have questioned whether I should criticize books, especially self-published books, by their cover at all. I respectfully disagree with those people and stand by my choice to judge a book by its cover. A book cover, like any piece of art, is open to reasonable criticism...even the covers of indie books.

You see a good book cover really isn't that expensive. A quick search of DeviantArt and even the new website, Alternate History Fiction, shows there are people who can design book covers for affordable prices. Yes it still costs money and I understand not everyone may have the financial resources, but we aren't talking about the down payment on a house here. What we are talking about is an image that is often a potential reader's first impression with an author's work. Thus their really is no excuse for a self-published author or indie publisher to not put some money behind a good cover.

The big issue is that I found that a lot of self-published authors and indie publishers just take the easy route and add white text to a stock image. This to me shows they are not putting effort into something that is relatively simple to obtain and if they are not putting effort in this area, what else are they not putting effort into? Has anyone looked at the story who actually knows how to edit? Has anyone read the story to check for plot holes and other problems? Is the e-book file correctly formatted for e-readers? Did the author just rush everything just so he or she can say they published a book?

My own experience reading and reviewing indie works has shown me this rule-of-thumb: a better quality book cover often means better quality writing. Its not an absolute rule (Outrageous Fortunes by Steven White is an exception), but I have seen other reviewers agree with me on this rule. It makes sense in my mind because a good self-published author or indie publisher does everything possible to put the best book out there that they can, especially since they don't have the support of a major publisher with people on staff to do that job for them. That kind of effort will reflect in the quality of the story as well.

Some have suggested that book covers will become irrelevant due to there being more e-book only indie authors. I can't disagree more. You still need to attract attention to your book in some way, even if you don't publish a hard copy. A poor cover can stop someone from clicking on a book's Amazon page or the blog you got to review it. More importantly, self-published e-books already have a reputation for poor quality and cheap, quickly done covers aren't helping that. If indie authors and publishers want people to read their stories, they need to address some of the major issues inherent in their brand.

To be fair, it is nice to have a publisher behind you who can afford to pay a good artist to create a good cover, but I can think of many established and prolific authors who still have poor book covers. I mentioned before how much I don't like the excessive use of swastikas on books about World War II alternate histories. Don't tell me its relevant, it is still just cheap shock value and I always feel uncomfortable taking those books out in public. Additionally, Matthew Schneider-Mayerson said in his article on alternate history that the genre is popular because it allows for high concept ideas to be expressed in book covers. Just slapping a swastika on same famous landmark where it doesn't belong is just as lazy as using a stock image in my opinion.

That all being said, I understand that people are concerned about is that you shouldn't dismiss a book simply due to its cover because what's inside could still be good. Meanwhile, a book with a good cover can actually have a terrible story. I agree with both possibilities, but I also believe the phrase "don't judge a book by its cover" shouldn't be taken so literally. To paraphrase what Dale Cozort said in my interview with him, authors and publishers still need to market their book if they want anyone to read it and a book cover is the central feature of any good book marketing campaign. Your story may be excellent, but if no one wants to look past the cover, then no one is going to read it.

You should, however, take the "have cake and eat it too" saying literally. Seriously, who gets a cake to NOT eat it?

* * *

Matt Mitrovich is the founder and editor of Alternate History Weekly Update, a blogger on Amazing Stories and a Sidewise Awards for Alternate History judge. When not writing he works as an attorney, enjoys life with his beautiful wife Alana and prepares for the day when travel between parallel universes becomes a reality. You can follow him on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. Learn how you can support his alternate history projects on Patreon.

Friday, December 4, 2015

A Timeline Author’s Plea

Guest post by Alexander “SpanishSpy” Wallace.
I am no Turtledove, no Stirling, no Harris, no de Camp, no Conroy. I have no monetary incentive to write alternate history. I write timelines on AlternateHistory.com, and previously the alternate history wikia, for a sheer love of the genre, much like many other hobbyists. I have a busy life; alternate history is a passion. I research and write and develop stories for hours in my spare time. I believe this would sound familiar to many others in the community.

This is a labor of love for me and for many others. When we post our work on the internet, we do so with hopes, hopes of approval from our fellow alternate historians. We fervently wish for the approval of others who are more learned than us, more knowledgeable in the realm of history.

Sometimes, we get that validation. Comments come in, and we see the fruits of our labors. However, often, this is unfortunately not the case.

I can tell there are people reading my timelines, for the hundreds to thousands of views would pay testament to that. And yet, I can go days, weeks, months even without getting a single comment. One would think that readers would have questions or comments about something that interests them. But there is nothing.

I can think of few feelings more disheartening than pouring hours of work into a timeline and receiving no feedback for months. I do not exaggerate; I have filled whole AH.com pages, twenty posts, without a single comment, and other works can average a comment a page. But I keep working, because I love the craft.

It gives the feeling that our work is at best ignored, at worst actively looked down upon. Am I being too wordy? Not detailed enough? Too heavy on expository heavy? I do not know. And I can’t know. And it leaves a feeling of utter abandonment, especially when there were previous comments.

I believe I speak for many writers when I ask the readership of AlternateHistory.com and of any other alternate history site out there when I say that comments are not only encouraged; they give reason for us to continue writing. We have no editors, no proofreaders, hardly any confidantes to share our work with before it goes public. It is with the readership that our efforts are appreciated or abandoned. It is with the broader alternate history community that our vindication rests.

* * *

Alexander "SpanishSpy" Wallace is the author of several works of alternate history on alternatehistory.com and the alternate history wikia, including the 2014 Turtledove Award Winner for Best New Speculative, The Rise of the Tri-State World Order: A Timeline of Orwell's 1984, Emancipation and Exodus, and Scorpions in a Bottle, as well as other works. 

Wednesday, December 2, 2015

Top 5 Posts from November 2015

I am thankful for November 2015 being the third best month in terms of page views in The Update's short history. Here are the top 5 articles that helped make it happen:






* * *

Matt Mitrovich is the founder and editor of Alternate History Weekly Update, a blogger on Amazing Stories and a Sidewise Awards for Alternate History judge. When not writing he works as an attorney, enjoys life with his beautiful wife Alana and prepares for the day when travel between parallel universes becomes a reality. You can follow him on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. Learn how you can support his alternate history projects on Patreon.

Friday, November 6, 2015

Is the Alternate History Community Over-Centralized?

The Holy Roman Empire wishes it could be as over-centralized as the Alternate Historians!
When it was announced that Counter-Factual.net was closing its doors at the end of the year, alternate historians voiced their concern that the community was in danger of becoming "over-centralized". Presumably they are referring to how AlternateHistory.com's size has cornered the market on alternate history discussion, but are these concerns justified?

First, when I say the alternate history community, I am referring to the English-language speaking alternate history community. I know there are plenty of non-English alternate history sites out there, but I don't know enough about them to comment whether they have the same issues the English-speaking community may have. So with that out of the way, before we can state with any certainty about why the alternate history community is over-centralized, we need to ask why is AlternateHistory.com so big?

We know AlternateHistory.com is the largest gathering of alternate historians on the Internet. As I write this, they boast 24,012 members and celebrated a major milestone of having 5,752 of those members online last August. Those are impressive numbers, but while some may dismiss these successes simply because AlternateHistory.com's name puts it at the top of all Google searches for "alternate history", I fear that would be oversimplifying things.

One of the reasons AlternateHistory.com was able to replace Soc.history.what-if (which replaced GEnie and you should remember that fact because its important later on) as the center of alternate history discussion was because it provided a moderated forum to talk about alternate history. Ian Montgomerie, AlternateHistory.com's founder and administrator, and his volunteers moderators work hard to keep the worst trolls from starting flame wars that could destroy a forum (see Alternia).

While some have accused AlternateHistory.com staff of having a liberal bias, as someone who considers himself a moderate and sees conservatives on the forum having reasonable discussions with other people on the political spectrum, I personally find those criticisms to be a tad unfair. I think Ian and the mods have done a pretty good job being fair and balanced. I have seen them willing to admit that they made mistakes and give out second chances. Plus they do try to treat everyone the same regardless of a member's popularity (see joatsimeon@aol.com). That has gone a long way in my opinion in making AlternateHistory.com a successful alternate history site. The name alone couldn't have kept people there if it was administered poorly.

On the flip side, that doesn't really solve the issue of the community being over-centralized. Except for AltHistory Wiki and few other smaller sites, the community is heavily influenced by the culture of AlternateHistory.com. On its face, that isn't necessarily a bad thing (and I already explained the issues I have with the AlHistory Wiki so I'm glad the community isn't taking its cues from them), but it means diverse voices could be (unintentionally) silenced by the behemoth that is AlternateHistory.com. The pressure to conform to the standards of the majority may be too great in a community that seems centered on just one site and is already pretty small to begin with.

Should we be worried? Actually, no. As we should all know, history tends to repeat itself. Remember that not only did AlternateHistory.com's forum replace Soc.history.what-if's newsgroup, but Soc.history.what-if itself replaced GEnie's RoundTables. Thus there is a strong possibility of some other discussion group format replacing AlternateHistory.com. Consider Generation Z, or the post-Millenials. These are the children who have known no other world besides the one that has the Internet in it. And what is the #1 way they communicate with each other? Social media. Places like Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Tumblr and so on. To them "forums" may seem a tad archaic and old fashioned. That's not saying people of this generation don't use them, but they certainly use social media a lot more.

As this generation of alternate historians comes of age, they may gravitate towards a means of communication they are more comfortable with rather than the format of AlternateHistory.com. In time, AlternateHistory.com may go the way of Soc.history.what-if and other sites that have come and gone. Now to be fair this may not happen for years to come or at all. Some have suggested that certain social media platforms aren't conducive for finding or cataloging alternate histories...at least for now. As time goes on, its quite possible AlternateHistory.com may find itself losing active members to new groups arising on social media.

So I wouldn't worry too much about the community being "over-centralized", but if you find my social media prediction to be bogus or just want to decentralize things faster, then I got an easy fix for you: go create your own alternate history site! I'm not talking about another forum (God knows we have seen dozens of those over the years), but more like the personal websites that were popular during the Age of Geocities (roughly between 1994-2003) when stand-alone alternate history sites were prevalent. These were usually maintained by one author who showcased their work in a central location.

The thing is that it is easier than ever to create a website or blog these days. Blogger and WordPress have a lot of useful tools to help you and for those who post a lot of timelines on AlternateHistory.com or elsewhere, it may be helpful to have one place where all of your work is recorded. Who knows? Some communities of fans may even start to congregate around these sites, much like what happened with the sadly defunct Shattered World. If you want some examples about what I am talking about, check out the blogs of Sam McDonald, Lynn Davis, Sean Sherman, Tyler Bugg and Jeff Provine.

AlternateHistory.com may be the king of alternate history for now, but in time this could change. A whole new generation is growing up in a world that is in a constant state of flux. We have no idea what the future will hold for our community, but whatever happens, there will always be people out there asking "what if".

* * *

Matt Mitrovich is the founder and editor of Alternate History Weekly Update, a blogger on Amazing Stories and a Sidewise Awards for Alternate History judge. When not writing he works as an attorney, enjoys life with his beautiful wife Alana and prepares for the day when travel between parallel universes becomes a reality. You can follow him on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. Learn how you can support his alternate history projects on Patreon.

Friday, September 25, 2015

What the Hell Happened to the AltHistory Wiki?


From 2009 to 2011, I considered myself an active member of the AltHistory Wiki community. I was a regular contributor to "1983: Doomsday" and other timelines. I also pitched in with combating vandals and I must have made myself a big enough annoyance that someone decided it would be easier just to make me an administrator to the Wiki instead of reading the ton of messages I left on people's talk pages warning them of the damage. I took my role as administrator seriously and used my limited free time to do my best to clean up the Wiki. I helped institute new policies to govern the wiki more effectively and promoted ideas I thought would help encourage a stronger sense of community, like the Stirling Awards and revamping the way Featured Timelines were selected. I was proud of what I accomplished and of the people who followed in my footsteps.

In 2011, I retired from my post as a member of the "Brass" (the administrator rank which, besides having the power to ban members, can also grant administrative powers to other members) and eventually created Alternate History Weekly Update. At the time I said that I wanted to focus more on my own writing because I felt that managing the Wiki was distracting me from it. That, however, was only part of the reason why I left. To be frank, I was burnt out from dealing with the Wiki. As time went by, many of the people I befriended there had left and the newcomers, although many were talented writers and all-around pleasant people, had some major ego cases in their ranks. I became tired of all the arguments and the snark. I also had creative differences with the direction "1983: Doomsday" was going. It had quickly turned from a grim world of nuclear war where the United States had fallen apart while a rump-Soviet Union lived on, to an atompunk fantasy. It became clear that I needed a break.

So I left the Wiki and started blogging and the rest, as they say, is history. I eventually did return to the Wiki, but only as a lurker and I maintained that my retirement from the Time Stream Protection Task Force (or the TSPTF, which is the collective name the administrators refer to themselves as) was still in effect. I even dropped into their Chat a couple of times and was surprised not only to see that many people still remembered me, but that a lot of the new faces who I had never met knew of me. It felt good and made me happy that I had decided to return in my limited capacity.

Then things started to go downhill. I noticed that on other alternate history sites, most notably AlternateHistory.com, the AltHistory Wiki had a reputation for bad alternate history and immature users who only produced Map Games. Now I am not a fan of the Wiki's Map Games. I don't have any particular dislike for them, they just aren't for me. To be fair the Map Games didn't seem all that different from AlternateHistory.com's Shared Worlds forum, so I didn't think they had that much right to complain. That being said, yeah I read my fair share of bad alternate histories on the Wiki, but you can find those on any community. The Wiki does have good timelines (last month I featured "Winged Hands of the Reich" by SpanishSpy), but an argument can be made that the format of the Wiki means its hard to find them and bad timelines often get pushed to the front.

What I am saying is that at first I wasn't concerned about the criticisms I was hearing. The longer I lurked on the AltHistory Wiki, however, the more weight I gave to those criticisms. The aforementioned Chat had no content restrictions enforced and often would degenerate into flame wars that would spill into other parts of the Wiki. I stumbled upon a subreddit for the Wiki that actually had threads to organize attacks on specific members. While scanning some of these arguments and attacks, I even began to notice cliques forming that often spent more time harassing outsiders than discussing alternate history. Meanwhile, TSPTF members were either increasingly absent or just didn't care, sometimes even participating in these disputes by egging on the combatants. The final straw for me was seeing another spill over from a Chat fight on the TSPTF talk page referencing "penile yeast infection", gay jokes and seeming unconcern that people were using sockpuppets.

You know what this all reminds me of? The Fall of Alternia. Just like with the AltHistory Wiki, you had a divided community that was more interested in arguing about everything besides what the community was supposed to be talking about: alternate history. The AltHistory Wiki in my mind has devolved into a haven for Internet trolls that deserves its poor reputation. What is even worse is that the Wiki is suffering a brain drain. You know where I found all those people I first met when I started editing back in 2009? AlternateHistory.com. You know where I talked to SpanishSpy after he noticed I had featured his work on Timeline Thursday? AlternateHistory.com. The good writers have left and will continue to leave before everything collapses, just like with Alternia. The difference is that I don't think there is a way to delete the Wiki once it all falls apart, since the ultimate owner of the place is Wikia.

Is there a solution? Well I got a few ideas off the top of my head. First, get rid of Chat, just close it down entirely. Its a source of a lot of the fighting and the current user base has already shown they can't regulate themselves. The AltHistory Wiki needs to take a stand that they will focus solely on alternate history and not be distracted by off-topic conversations. Second, spin off the Map Games into their own separate, but affiliated, wiki. I am perhaps being unfair to the Map Gamers, but it seems to me that a lot of the major troublemakers are from that group of users. Third, find a way to highlight the good alternate histories besides the Featured Timelines and the Stirling Awards. To be honest, I have no specific ideas on how to do that, but the Wiki needs to work on repairing its reputation and doing nothing to better showcase the good is not helping. Perhaps one thing they can do immediately is purge themselves of poorly constructed timelines and their affiliated articles that haven't been edited in years. It will certainly be a start in removing the bad so people can find the good.

I would also recommend that the AltHistory Wiki start purging some of the worst trolls. I'm not going to start naming names, simply because I am not active enough in the community currently to do a fair job of it, but I am sure that if the Wiki's users thought about it they could pick some people who have been the worst of the worst. Those whose damage they cause is greater than whatever benefit they bring to the Wiki. This, and spinning off the Map Games into its separate wiki, would likely see the active user base drop significantly, but it would give the community time to return to what they do best: collaborative alternate histories. Perhaps it will also see new blood joining, who may have been scared away by the people they ran into while editing.

Finally, and this is my most important point, the community has to do this. Let me reiterate: the COMMUNITY has to do this. The TSPTF will have their role (and besides they should only be volunteers who help with the technical aspects of the wiki and NOT the sole decision makers) and leaders from outside the administrators will emerge, but the community has to do it together. The AltHistory Wiki has always been more communal in its governance than other alternate history communities, like AlternateHistory.com. That has made it unique and perhaps explain why shared universes like "1983: Doomsday" were able to thrive. If the AltHistory Wiki is going to be saved, every single active member must step up and play their role. It shouldn't just be assumed the TSPTF or someone else will take care of it.

Well now that I said all of the above I probably just alienated a good portion of my reader base. I easily could be exaggerating some of the problems the AltHistory Wiki faces and I could have been one of the reasons why it is in its current state. That being said, the Wiki still has some major problems, but there is still time to pull it back from the brink. It will take a lot of work, but I still think the AltHistory Wiki can be fixed, if the community cares enough to do it.

* * *

Matt Mitrovich is the founder and editor of Alternate History Weekly Update, a blogger on Amazing Stories and a Sidewise Awards for Alternate History judge. When not writing he works as an attorney, enjoys life with his beautiful wife Alana and prepares for the day when travel between parallel universes becomes a reality. You can follow him on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. Learn how you can support his alternate history projects on Patreon.

Friday, September 18, 2015

Do Alternate Historians Hate Steampunk?

If there is one constant criticism I get from alternate historians from AlternateHistory.com and other sites its that Alternate History Weekly Update has way too much steampunk content on it. One person even suggested I change the name to "Steampunk Weekly Update". You would think there really wouldn't be that much tension between the two genres, since many steampunk works have alternate history elements to them, but than again many also don't. Nevertheless, alternate historians remain critical of steampunk. So I ask: do alternate historians hate steampunk?

Some background first. In 1987, KW Jeter came up with the term "steampunk" to describe a new literary movement where stories were set primarily in Victorian England or the American Wild West, but featured advanced technology and modern social mores. As mentioned before many of these stories had alternate history elements. Good examples include The Warlord of the Air and The Difference Engine, which are both alternate history novels that were influential on early steampunk creators.

So the two genres, alternate history and steampunk, can be considered at the very least cousins in a sense. Despite these shared origins, the history of steampunk and alternate history would begin to diverge at this point. While alternate history remained primarily a literary genre with most communication between fans and creators taking place on the Internet, steampunk would evolve into an atheistic movement that received mainstream acceptance and was embraced by many different formats. Heck there is even a realty television show dedicated to steampunk fashion.

The divide has only grown as steampunk's popularity increases. In 2007, searches for “steampunk” on Google began to trend higher than “alternate history”. In 2013, an IBM supercomputer even predicted that steampunk would be the next big retail trend. Some alternate historians even believe the increase in popularity in steampunk has begun to negatively affect the genre. For example, Robert Schmunk, Uchronia founder and former Sidewise judge, told Motherboard:
In the past several years, alternate history has been fading, or perhaps I should say morphing, because there’s been a big increase in the publication of steampunk stories and novels…Many steampunk works are legitimately alternate history, but a lot are not…I think the Roman Empire theme has faded, and perhaps the ‘Hitler wins’ theme just a bit, also…’The South wins the Civil War’ seems to be hanging in there, especially as this is often used as part of the background for alternate-history-steampunk works.
Which got me thinking: are alternate historians just the hipsters of the speculative historical fiction community? Do they reject whats popular and embrace obscure works only because "you probably haven't heard of them"? Perhaps, but then again, alternate historians are at their core lovers of history. To be able to craft plausible alternate histories, you need to understand just what you are changing. For alternate historians, the mark of a good creator is someone who can make a plausible alternate history, while still providing us with an entertaining read.

Steampunk, while often set during different historical periods, often plays fast and loose with our history and sometimes drop it altogether and the laws of physics along with it. Thus steampunk can be set on a magical world where steam powered mecha exist alongside late 19th century mores, even if the place names don't match anything on this Earth. Blatant disregard for plausibility just for the sake of what looks or sounds cool is enough to set off any serious alternate historian, regardless if the the subject is popular with the mainstream or not. So do I think alternate historians hate steampunk? No, they just don't like bad alternate history.

Personally I have no major issues with steampunk and can even recommend a few good steampunk books (like Cherie Priest's Boneshaker or Alan Gratz's The League of Seven). Being a lover of stories, however, I actually have no plans to cosplay as some intrepid airship pilot. Its not because I think its silly or stupid, its just that I am not interested. I will always put the story over everything else (and there may be many other alternate historians who will agree with me), but I still think there can be peace between steampunk and alternate history. Hey, we are family after all.

* * *

Matt Mitrovich is the founder and editor of Alternate History Weekly Update, a blogger on Amazing Stories and a Sidewise Awards for Alternate History judge. When not writing he works as an attorney, enjoys life with his beautiful wife Alana and prepares for the day when travel between parallel universes becomes a reality. You can follow him on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. Learn how you can support his alternate history projects on Patreon.