Entry for the DBWI Writing Contest.
At this
year’s Worlds that Weren’t Conference in Chicago, several famous counterfactual
authors sat on a panel to discuss the impact of one of modern history’s most
famous statesman: Hugo Eckener, the last president of the German Republic from
1932-1939, and foreign minister of the restored German Empire from 1940-1942.
Those on the discussion panel included Terry Dove, author of Das International; Brian Simmons, author
of Pax Europa; Frank Julian, author
of Dai Nippon; Shelly Bailey, author
of Madam President; and Hank Kent,
author of The Dark Reich. At the
heart of the discussion was whether or not the “great man theory” of history
plays into counterfactual fiction, looking specifically at how Hugo Eckener
affected world history and how greatly his absence would change history.
MODERATOR: Most
historians would agree that Hugo Eckener had a profound impact on modern
history. But just how deep was that impact? And what would our world be like if
Mr. Eckener hadn’t had the impact he had on it? We’ll start the discussion off
with Mrs. Terry Dove. Terry, in your book, you describe a pretty bleak outlook
of a world without Eckener, do you not?
DOVE: Well, it
isn’t exactly a world without Eckener. Just with him dying twelve years
earlier, in 1941 instead of 1954. And it’s how he dies that in my book affects
the outcome of events.
MODERATOR:
Correct. You have Eckener dying in the Graf
Zeppelin bombing in March of 1941 during the height of the Danzig Crisis.
DOVE: Right. In
real life, Eckener was at a meeting with Danzig city leaders and was not on
board the Graf when the bomb that was
mailed to him exploded. In my book, the meeting is cancelled and Eckener is killed
when the bomb goes off. As a result, Germany will end up sending troops to
Danzig and eventually lead to war between the German Empire and Poland. The
Soviet Union joins the war in 1942, and a stalemate develops.
MODERATOR: That
is until you have the Soviets develop the atomic bomb decades before the weapon
was actually created in real life. How do you justify that?
DOVE: Scientific
papers from the time actually spoke of turning atomic research towards weapons.
Luckily for us, there were no major wars going on at the time and when atomic
research finally does get underway, the Germans focused on energy first.
Weapons followed later. In my book, the Germans and Soviets both start working
on the Atom Bomb in the mid-1940s, and the Soviets get it first because their
major cities are far enough away from the fighting. The war is mainly fought in
Poland and Germany, and Soviet cities are spared. This leads to the Soviets
dropping the Bomb on Berlin in 1951, and from there Germany falls pretty
quickly and Soviet communism spread into Central Europe.
MODERATOR: Mr.
Brian Simmons, what do you think of those turn of events that Terry came up
with? Your book, Pax Europa, takes a
very different turn of events, does it not?
SIMMONS: Yes, yes
it does. In Pax, Eckener doesn’t even
get involved in the Imperial government. He declines the Kaiser’s offer and
remains in Ecknerstadt with ZGI and builds airships until his death in 1954.
And Europe does just fine without him. I’m not saying that Eckener wasn't a
great statesman. He was. But I don’t subscribe to the Great Man theory. I think
that the course of history would have stayed mostly the same. Possibly better,
possibly a little worse, but very recognizable to today. Obviously, the further
back in time a change occurs, the more bees there are to cause other changes
and those changes eventually add up. But in a mere 70 years, I don’t think
those changes would have been that drastic. The Danzig Crisis would have played
out similar to OTL, and Germany and the Soviet Union would have faced off
sometime in the mid-1950s with German victory.
MODERATOR: Now,
in your book, it’s more than just a German victory over the Soviet Union in the
1950s, isn’t it?
SIMMONS: That’s
correct. Without Eckener’s continued influence, the Imperial government starts
a stronger, more aggressive rearmament in the early 1940s, and by the time the
war comes they have a greater advantage. Plus, I have Stalin die earlier, of
natural causes, so the leadership passes to Molotov, but Molotov doesn't have
the support of Beria or some of the Army. Earlier leadership crisis equals
earlier defeat, and this time more soundly, with no rump Soviet Union. A
Russian Republic is established.
MODERATOR: Your
book has done really well since its release this spring. Do you think that is
because it creates a world where the Second Great War never happens, and with
that conflict only having ended a year ago, some people see it as a way of
escape from today’s realities?
SIMMONS: Oh I’m
sure that has something to do with it. Never mind my writing skills (polite laughs from the members of the panel
and the audience). I mean, that is part of what fiction is, an escape from
our reality. And when I was writing that book, it was a nice escape at times,
especially after loosing one of my nephews to the fighting on the Western Front
in East Russia. In the world of Pax,
there is no independent East Russia.
MODERATOR: That’s
a good point. And of course, without East Russia or a restored Russian Empire,
there is no cause for the outbreak of the recent war. Now Brian, I’d say that
you are probably in the minority on this panel about the belief in the Great
Man series. The gentleman sitting next to you, Mr. Frank Julian, certainly has a different view, right
Frank?
JULLIAN: You
could say that. Pax Europa is a good
book, and no one can top Brian when it comes to research, detail, and
authenticity. But I don’t agree that the course of history will keep going the
same way regardless of who’s at the helm. And that’s definitely obvious in Dai Nippon. Just like in Terry’s book,
Eckener is killed in the Graf bombing
in 1941. Germany invades Poland, and war starts with the Soviets in 1942.
However, unlike in Terry’s book, other western nations get involved, including
the UK and France and eventually the USA. With everyone’s attention focused in
Europe, Japan is free to expand with little stopping her. China falls, and
several European powers sell their holdings to help finance the Polish War.
Eventually the war in Europe comes to a less than satisfactory close, and at
that point America and Japan go to blows. But with America being worn out from
Europe, they don’t stand a chance. By the 1960s, Japan is the unchallenged
power in the Pacific.
MODERATOR:
Everyone I've talked to about your book loves that part of the story takes
place in the restored Kingdom of Hawaii. And I personally like how you have
that coming about locally, and it not being just a Japanese puppet, which is
what I thought you were going to do when I first learned about Dai Nippon. Your book and Terry’s is a
great showcase about the diversity in counterfactual fiction. You both use the
exact same point of divergence, but come up with completely different
scenarios. Speaking of unique scenarios, that brings us to Shelly Bailey and
her wonderful book, Madam President. Shelly,
how does Eckener fit in to your world?
BAILEY: Well, in the book Eckener is able to avoid
some of his missteps in the later 30s and prevents the restoration of the
German Empire. The German Republic remains in force, and Eckener actually gets
reelected in 1938, and will serve as Germany’s president until 1944. One of the
political fallouts of this will eventually be earlier women’s rights movement in
the 1950s and 1960s that spreads around the world. The book focuses on the
election of America’s first female president in 1968.
MODERATOR: I have
to say this was one of the more unique outcomes of an alternate life for Mr.
Eckener. Would you say that you subscribe to the Great Man theory as well?
BAILEY: Yes I do.
The people in charge steer the way history goes. Now, the changes aren’t always
super drastic, especially not at first. The closer to the change you are, the
fewer bees have moved about differently, but eventually changes happen.
MODERATOR: That’s
a good argument. Now the Bee Effect Theory has been mentioned several times
during this discussion, and I think Mr. Hank Kent’s book, The Dark Reich, illustrates that theory, and it’s heavy
application, quite well. Hank, what’s your take on Eckener’s importance.
KENT: Well, in my
book, Eckener doesn’t run in the 1932 election, and the different outcome is
quite drastic. Adolf Hitler, who in reality is little more than a footnote in
history, would have likely beat Communist Ernst Thälmann, bringing fascism to
power in Germany exactly a decade after it took power in Italy. Hitler and
Mussolini team up, and then they both help Oswald Mosley take power in the mid
1940s, more than two decades ahead of OTL. Meanwhile, America starts putting
more and more distance between itself and fascism, aligning itself more and
more when the Soviet Union. The Dark
Reich, which is the first book in a series of three, starts out in the mid
1960s as the world finds itself on the brink of a global conflict between the
nations of the Right, which is most of Western Europe, and the nations of the
Left, which is the Soviet Union, the United States and much of Latin
America. Quite the departure from the
normal scenarios with Eckener. Which in a way is strange, when you think about
it. Eckener NOT becoming President of
Germany in 1932 would have been the biggest change of all. Also, I have always
found it odd that more counterfactual novels don’t have the USA drift into the
USSR’s camp. I mean, the Socialist Party has been one of the strongest parties
in this country for the past two decades, and it seems natural to me to see
that shift to the left happen even sooner in Counterfactual novels, especially
ones that have PODs set in the 1930s.
MODERATOR: You
know, you bring up an interesting point there when you say that the most
obvious POD with Eckener is to not have him elected President in 1932. Well, I
have one for all of you that is almost never done in CF fiction. What if
President Hindenburg hadn't died in February 1932? If he hadn't died, he would
almost definitely have been reelected as President. What would have happened if
his death were postponed until 1933 or 1934? Any takers on that?
KENT: Honestly, I
think a world where Hindenburg lives another couple of years would probably
resemble the world of my book. With more time, Hitler could build a stronger
political base and likely gain the chancellorship under a second Hindenburg
term. The Nazis were slowly but surely growing before Eckener and his
administration cracked down on them. It’s conceivable that the Nazis could have
had enough of a majority in 1933 or 1934 to put Hitler in as chancellor. I've
heard arguments that this might have mellowed him, making him adapt to the
democratic system to the point he would tone down his anti-Semitic and war
mongering rhetoric, but I think he could easily retained his earlier fire.
SIMMONS: What
Hank says is a possibility, but I’m inclined to disagree. I think that, the
longer the democratic system remains in place, the more unlikely radical
leaders could have gained control. Furthermore, by 1934, we are farther removed
from the start of the Great Depression, and it is likely that things would
already be on the mend and people would start tuning out the radicals on both
the left and the right. In all likelihood, by 1934 the Nazis would have lost
seats and be a minority party, maybe just above fringe level, and when the country
voted for a successor to Hindenburg, more moderate voices have a better chance
of being heard. And who knows, Eckener could end up being approached by the
Centre Party and the SPD to run in 1933 or 1934 if Hindenburg died then instead
of when he actually did.
DOVE: I actually
read an essay posted online a few years back that posed pretty much this
scenario. Hindenburg doesn't die in 1932, and is reelected defeating both
Hitler and Thälmann. The Nazis gain a little in elections held in 1933, and
Hitler is appointed as a senior member of the cabinet under Chancellor Otto
Wels. In 1934, the Nazis loose seats and then in the summer, Hindenburg dies.
The author then predicted that Wels would run for the President and win, again
beating the Nazis and the Communists. Another moderate politician would become
Chancellor, and Hitler might remain for another year or so in the Cabinet. But
by the end of the 1930s, the Nazis would have lost enough seats in the
Reichstag that Hitler was removed from government and the party breaks up in
the 1940s.
JULLIAN: I think
I read that same essay as well, and I’m not sure I agree. Remember, we are
talking about a party that attempted to kill Eckener and succeeded in killing
Otto Wels in the fall of 1932. People who are willing to do stuff like that
will put up a strong fight, and I question whether or not they’d use any means
necessary to make sure Hitler wins the next presidential election to fill a
vacancy left by Hindenburg later in the 1930s. I've read most of Mien Kampf, Hitler’s manifesto he wrote
in 1923. It took a life sentence in prison to break Hitler’s radical spirit.
Anything short of that….I’m very skeptical. And I also don’t know that Eckener
would have had as easy a time of it if he didn't run until 1933 or 1934. In
those two years, the Nazis could likely have increased their base and be in a
much stronger place to challenge Eckener’s election than they were in 1932.
This is just a snippet of the debate that went on during
this hour and a half panel discussion that occurred at WTW 2006. The full
discussion can be found online at wwn.wtwonline.usa/2006/panels, along with
several other panel discussions that occurred, including a related topic to
Eckener: the importance of Airships in modern aviation. In that discussion,
several authors and experts discuss how the craft have impacted modern history,
and try to figure out how their development could have gone differently.
-Hugo Tyler, Science Fiction Magazine, June 2006.
* * *
Zach Anderson is studying to become a history teacher in Oklahoma. When he's not working on his studies, he likes to think about what might have been in years past, and when he gets a particularly good idea going, it will end up on his blog, the Weekly Chrononaut. You can find his biggest work, The Airship President and Legacy, a world where the airship survives, Hitler never comes to power, and where the Soviet Union crumbles in the 1970s, on that blog in addition to several other stories. He also posts on alternatehistory.com under the username Eckener.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.